Sigma’s Fresh line intends to convey you a high quality lens in a mild and compact bundle. This is not Sigma’s flagship line, however does this lens have what it takes to move up in opposition to the others? It is mild, small, speedy, robust and inexpensive. Does this Sigma lens take a look at the entire containers on our record?

On this video, Dunna from Dunna Did It explores whether or not the Sigma 16-35mm f/2.8 DG DN | C lens stands as much as the efficiency of the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di II RXD and the Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM. You could say that evaluating this $899 lens in opposition to a $2,200 GM lens is somewhat unfair, and it may well be, however I believe you’ll be able to to find the effects fascinating, to mention the least. Within the specifications comparability, Dunna additionally compares it to the Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G lens, which is not rather as dear because the GM lens.

He begins off with an extended and detailed video montage of him trekking, and if you’re a videographer, this provides you with a good thought of whether or not this lens can carry out in a normal outdoor b-roll shoot. In case you are a vlogger, then the 16mm focal period, small measurement, and light-weight weight are all plus issues when pitted in opposition to the 16-35mm GM. He additionally seems into nonetheless symbol high quality of the lens, and compares it with the opposite two when capturing with the Sony a7 IV.

So, with the entire bases lined on this video, what do you recall to mind the lens? Is it a excellent possibility in the event you simply desire a 16mm lens and do not want it to succeed in the entire approach out to 35mm? Would you purchase it?